Seeds of Corruption in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Part-I (Dr. Bramhadev Pattnaik)

Seeds of Corruption at the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)

Part-I (Dr. Bramhadev Pattnaik)
भारतीय कृषि अनुसन्धान परिषद् में भ्रष्टाचार के बीज: भाग एक (डा. ब्रम्हदेव पटनायक, निदेशक PD-FMD)  
With PMO Grievance Registration Number is: PMOPG/E/2017/0625380 

Why the Council is Silent? (http://azad-azadindia.blogspot.com/2017/07/honest-government-of-india-is-silent.html) Why it has not taken any action against Dr. B. Pattnaik (Project Director ICR-PDFMD, Mukteshwar who has done forgery, who has embezzled the government funds, who has misappropriated the Institute funds, who has minted money through payment of fake bills, who has forged the reports, agreements and official documents? Question is who is the breeder of Corruption at the Council maintaining the nucleus seeds?

What Dr. B. Pattnaik did?

A.  In 2008, as Director ICAR-PD Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Mukteshwar, Dr. B. Pattnaik made payment of Rs. 60, 0000/= against faked bills?

The action of the Council: Reward for corruption.

1. Issued a general letter to all the ICAR bodies not make payment without receiving the ordered good.
2.  Dr. Pattnaik was given a second tenure as Director, to keep on breeding the corruption.
3.  Dr. Pattnaik was given an opportunity to establish an International referral laboratory for FMD at Bhubaneswar for Rs. 500 crores, in his native state.  
4. Dr. Pattnaik’s  aides were given promotion.

B.  In 2014 as an expert of FMD he was the member of GOI committee under the chairmanship of Dr. Gaya Prasad (then ADG AH) to retest the vaccines declared substandard at CCS NIAH, Baghpat (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267705649_Testing_of_FMD_Vaccine_intended_to_be_used_under_FMD-CP_of_Govt_of_India_at_CCS_NIAH_Baghpat_UP_India?_iepl%5BviewId%5D=gbEYAweVRw3rEQFyOqBKuCX9&_iepl%5BprofilePublicationItemVariant%5D=default&_iepl%5Bcontexts%5D%5B0%5D=prfpi&_iepl%5BtargetEntityId%5D=PB%3A267705649&_iepl%5BinteractionType%5D=publicationTitle), and The committee made its forged report as:

a.       Samples tested at CCS NIAH were not re-tested by the committee.

b.      Reserve copy of the samples tested at CCS NIAH available at IVRI, Bengaluru was also not tested by the committee.

c.       Defying all the rules, samples were collected a fresh directly provided by the producers of substandard vaccine rather than collection from state depots where vaccines were available, or from State veterinary Hospital where the vaccine was being used or from the market.

d.      Samples, if collected, were collected by unauthorized persons from inappropriate sites (directly from producers).

e.       Samples were never received at IVRI, Izatnagar as under RTI, IVRI failed to provide any proof of sample receipts in writing and also failed to show the samples physically.

f.       The samples were tested at IVRI, Izatnagar (an unauthorized place the to test the quality of FMD vaccine) instead of IVRI, Bengaluru.
g. The testing, if any was done at IVRI, Izatnagar was completed on 6th February 2015, and the report was submitted on 7th February 2015. However, the ccommittee submitted its report based on the said testing 25 days ahead othe f completion of the vaccine testing. What a clever forgery?
h. Report is still with ICAR vigilence but it was submitted on 6th February 2015 to High Court (at Lucknow) claiming that it has been accepted by the Council. The confident traitors bluffed the Court too.

i.      Moreover, as an expert, he approved the addition of enrofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone) as a preservative in FMD vaccine intended to be used in dairy animals. The parent company producing enrofloxacin prohibits its use in growing and dairy animals (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303685698_Use_of_Enrofloxacin_as_Preservative_in_FMD_vaccine?ev=pubitem-pub_supplemented&_iepl%5BviewId%5D=LdonVvGtL3L40IMiq0A92vd508Paq1jwaFx4&_iepl%5Bcontexts%5D%5B0%5D=pdppi&_iepl%5Bdata%5D%5Bmilestone%5D=experimentMilestoneClickedToPublicationFromRelatedWithFulltext&_iepl%5BinteractionType%5D=publicationView). This is prohibited because in age below 14 years in human it causes permanent damage to joints, ligaments, tendons and nerves and a child exposed to this drug may start to have epilepsy and he or she can never be an athlete. Probably it may be one of the reasons that India with 130 crores of people has no International athlete.

It is to remember that Dr. B. Pattnaik was the FMD Expert member in Committee of GOI constituted by Dr. KML Pathak (then DDG, AS) to enquire in the report of substandard FMD Vaccine from CCS NIAH, Baghpat. In the report, the committee used its forgery techniques and declared that the vaccine was of good quality. Certainly, the act would have been done with some ill intention. However, the Council is sitting on all the documents proving that the GOI committee not only forged the documents in the report but also bluffed the High Court and Farmers of India, all the documents were submitted more than 5 times to the council but of no avail, even Cabinet Minister for Agriculture and Farmers Welfare is too busy in saving the corrupt officials that he failed to take any notice even after 4 reminders over last one year. 

The Action of the Council: Again reward for corruption.

1.  Dr. Gaya Prasad (the chairman of the committee) is now VC of SVBP University of Agriculture and Technology Meerut.
2. Dr. B. Pattnaik has been given another term as director, he has been given immunity in council despite a criminal case against him, and he was tried to be made member of Agricultural Scientist Recruitment Board ASRB (the board selecting the scientists, directors and other staff for the Council, the probable breeder of corruption), which could not be materialized..

C.  Now the new case, proved his corruption abilities par excellence: In the following two cases Dr. B. Pattnaik paid Rs. 1763215/ (in case 1) and Rs. 28686/ (in case 2) from the Institute money without any permission. Both the cases are personal and the council is not the party to any extent. 

  1.      FIR No. 304/15 PS Inderpuri under Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC against Dr. Bramhadev Pattnaik (Project Director, ICAR-PDFMD) and 4 other accused individuals (not the council or any office head). The Charge sheet filed in the Court confirms the charges of a. cheating punishable u/s 415/420 IPC, b. Criminal breach of trust punishable u/s 409 IPC, c. Forgery punishable u/s 465 IPC, d. Forgery of valuable security (creation of forged/ fabricated document) punishable u/s 30 IPC, e. Forgery for the purpose of cheating punishable u/s 468B IPC, f. Using as genuine, a forged document punishable u/s 471IPC, g. Accused persons had a common intention (u/s 34 IPC), wilfully and intentionally aided each other to commit the crime punishable u/s 107 & 109 IPC, h. Committed cognizable offences punishable u/s 409/420/467/468/471 R/w Section 34 and 120B IPC.

  2.  W.P.(C)624/2017, Delhi High Court in BB Dash (CPIO, ICAR-PDFMD) versus Central Information Commission & ANR (Fined Rs. 25000/ for intentionally hiding/ not providing the information).

What the Schedule III [Page 106, vii) Legal charges for law suits to which Council is a party including a) Fees to barristers, pleaders, arbitrators and umpires, b) other legal charges for law suits or prosecution case as well as arbitration cases] says about powers delegated to the directors pertaining to payment? The director of the Institute has been given full powers to make the payments subject to previous consent of the Council.

However, in none of the above said case 1 & 2, neither the Council is party nor any consent from the Council has been obtained but bills of the barrister has been paid from funds of ICAR-PDFMD by Dr. Pattnaik using his Godly Powers. The RTI given below is self explanatory.

The Action of the Council: Again no action, Dr. B. Pattnaik is still the director of PD-FMD (http://www.pdfmd.ernet.in/index_files/Content/Personnel_Page/Personnel_details_Pattnaik_Sir.pdf).

Now question is: why the Council is not taking any action against him? Is it because he belongs to Orissa? Or, is his loyalty to the gang of corrupts in the Council still sitting at high posts? Or, is he has some good connections with those sitting in power positions? Or, is he has some secrets of those sitting in controlling positions? Or, has he some Godfather in PMO or the Council? Or something else hidden agenda is there.

Note: The text is based on information under RTI Act-2005 or available in the public domain.

Outcome of Complaint to PMO India

Status as on 03 Jan 2018

Registration Number	:	PMOPG/E/2017/0625380
Name Of Complainant	:	Bhoj Raj Singh
Date of Receipt	:	10 Dec 2017
Received by	:	Prime Ministers Office
Forwarded to	:	ICAR
Contact Address	:	Asstt. Director General (APB)
Contact Number	:	23383339
Grievance Description	:	Why ICAR Supports Corruption and Protects Corrupts? Respected Sir, I want to know the reasons why no action has been taken against people doing corruption in Indian Council of Agricultural Research. The best example is Dr. B. Pattnaik, Project Director ICR-PDFMD, Mukteshwar who has done forgery, who has embezzled the government funds, who has misappropriated the Institute funds, who has minted money through payment of fake bills, who has forged the reports, agreements and official documents? Question is who is the breeder of Corruption at the Council maintaining the nucleus seeds?
Current Status	:	CASE CLOSED
Your Feedback	:	Poor
Date of Action	:	03 Jan 2018
Details	:	The issue relating to FMD vaccine raised by Dr. Bhoj Raj Singh is under examination by the Vigilance Division of ICAR, New Delhi and at present, the action is pending.

A Proud moment for the Indian Veterinary Research Institute?

A proud moment for the Indian Veterinary Research Institute, was it a real proud moment?

It was pleasant to hear from the Director IVRI the story, of how IVRI stole the animal show at PM’s Varanasi visit. Further narrations by Dr. Bannerjee and Dr. Amarpal, the leaders of the IVRI team, were encouraging and interesting. However, in the whole story, it was shocking to know that the IVRI team was called because the PM wanted to see live surgery for the removal of polythene bags from the rumen of a cow. I was thinking and still thinking that the UP Animal Husbandry Department employing thousands of vets not have any vet capable of confidently performing the rumenotomy operation. This incident forced me to think:

1.  What quality of vets do we have? To perform rumenotomy two professors of surgery were assisted by another surgeon, and for the operation, we boasted that we had established a base on Mars or Venus. Really great!
2. What quality of vets are we producing? Is it not shameful for us, the professors and teachers of veterinary sciences in India?
3. Why are there only a few surgeons (so-called Surgeon Generals) to operate animals in IVRI and Uttar Pradesh (if it would have been an independent country UP might have been the 6^th most populated country in the world)?
4.     Why do dozens of postgraduates of veterinary surgery trained in IVRI itself and at many other renowned Veterinary colleges serving UP Animal Husbandry Department lack the confidence to show an operation to PM, and the principal secretary was compelled to call a team from IVRI?
5.  Was it really a proud moment for IVRI, imparting graduate to Ph.D. education in Veterinary science including surgery and other clinical specialties, when all the stalwarts of IVRI were to be present to demonstrate a simple operation?
6. Is this the quality of vets in the UP Animal Husbandry Department, do they really deserve that for which they are fighting and going on strike?
7. Where is veterinary education going to lead the country, and how is it going to double the income of poor farmers through animal husbandry?
8. Dr. Bannerjee, the head of the Parasitology Division of Premiere Veterinary Institute (IVRI) showed parasitic eggs and microscope utility and PM asked about the availability of the technique to farmers, and the simple reply was “NO”. After 70 years of independence, our veterinary hospitals lack microscopes? What kind of development we are boasting about? 
9.  Gaumata had her stomach full of 50 Kg of polybags! Is it a matter of pride to force the cows to feed on the roadside, eating in dustbins and roaming homeless?http://www.dairytoday.in/?p=2311, http://www.amarujala.com/india-news/pm-modi-varanasi-visit-inagurates-pashu-arogya-mela-rally-in-shahanshahpur-uttar-pradesh, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-in-varanasi-live-surgery-of-goat-cattle-to-be-demonstrated-in-front-of-pm/story-NziFsnhiWw6i17Zxl9MMII.html

Who is the bigger cheater?

It is said that Vijay Mallya siphoned money out of King Fisher’s coffers to shell companies and King Fisher run into a debt of 6000 crore rupees. King Fisher provided cheap flights to people and finally failed and Mallya is now branded as the great cheater.

Let us look now at Air India, getting all monitory assistance and undue support from the government, all government officials have to travel only through Air India paying 2-3 times of the fare for tickets than those available with other airlines. And the result is Air India is under 52000 crore debt.

Now decide, who is the bigger player, who is the bigger cheater? Nobody asked the CEOs of Air India where all the money got lost, where the money got siphoned.

My great India and Indian Economists and Planners!

Caution: I am neither economist, nor a planner, nor CEO, nor supporter of Mallya nor any critic, but a simple Indian who sometimes try to think.

How to control Diseases in Animals in India? भारत में पशु रोगों पर नियंत्रण कैसे संभव?

How to control Diseases in Animals in India?

भारत में पशु रोगों पर नियंत्रण कैसे संभव?

Tenets of Disease Control.

1. Stop false vaccination and vaccination programs.

2. Punish developers, approvers, and producers of fake and substandard and false vaccines and drugs.

3. Adopt test and segregation policy, test every 6 months for TB, JD, and Brucellosis.

4. Deworming regularly.

5. Disease mapping to assess the gravity of different problems. Involve true epidemiologists in disease control rather than false, self-acclaimed epidemiologists or those who have become epidemiologists due to managing their selection to high chairs.

6. At the national level, Instead of spending on useless vaccines and fake vaccination programs, spend that money compensating the farmers against their animals taken for segregation.

7. All Gaushalas and all veterinary Institutions having dairy farms in the name of teaching and education should be used as the house for the segregation of sick animals.

8. All such Gaushalas and Institutional farms should be used for research and management of sick animals. This program may also evaluate the efficacy of our so-called researchers having large claims.

9. The majority of the scientists should be allowed to work only on major disease problems in India rather than on fancied ideas and diseases.

10. Making the detailed program only after discussions with critics not with the approvers (chaploos) in light of our socioeconomic scenario and after prior testing of the program in the area of scientists working on the disease, if they can prove the program worked in the adopted villages for the study at least for 5 continuous years and evaluated independently only then National programs should be developed and implemented. Some people can say that it will further delay disease control in India, reply to them is what happened with the National disease control program for FMD after 15 years of intense hard work and money waste, Brucellosis and PPR control programs, all are big failures and only chaploos community can appreciate the success.

However, I know very well that my suggestions are useless and it is my mania to talk about. Neither the planners are going to correct nor myself is going to sit silently.

Then, why not to control diseases in India? Because:
1. Doing nothing is also an established epidemiological technique for disease control. Over time, the host and pathogen learn to live together harmoniously, and endemic stability will automatically take care of every worry.
2. However, it is an inbuilt error in the human genome not to sit idle thus the wise planners of India have devised a way to show that they are doing a lot (if they do a lot, the diseases may not exist for long and the continuous source of income from corruption in so many different disease control program may be drying) but doing nothing for disease control but everything for maintaining those.
3. It is a well-known fact in epidemiology that half-hearted attempts to control disease mean feeding the nectar to the disease to stay forever.
4. Thus Indian planners are going in the right direction to fulfill their motives to keep half of India's slaves, hungry and crawling.

Tenets of Disease Control from Dr. OS Habib (Professor of epidemiology and health care, University of Basrah, Al Başrah, College of Medicine)

(https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_you_need_to_understand_before_attempting_any_disease_control_program?59caafabf7b67e8b6b7d3eea#59cb046096b7e4f02826a002)

The first step is a thorough situational analysis and environmental examination to gather information about:

a. Population size, age, and sex composition

b. Epidemiological analysis of morbidity and mortality. Define the types of problems, extent,  severity, causes, and impact on the community as a whole.

c. identify financial, manpower, legal, ethical and other constraints.

d. Identify complaints and expectations of the population.

e. Available health care facilities (for training and services delivery).

The second step is to decide on priorities. To decide on which problem to prevent first, when we have limited resources and we face more than one problem. The usual criteria used in this context are

•  The extent of the problem.
•  The severity of the problem.
•  Manageability of the problem.
•  Community concern about the problem.

The third step is to state clearly the short-term and long-term objectives or goals to be achieved. These are the desired end results of an action. They are the guide to action and the yardstick to measure work after it is done. It is preferable that objectives are phrased in quantitative and measurable terms and made logical and feasible within available resources.     

 The fourth step is to explore and formulate alternative strategies to be adopted: their feasibility, operational choice, and the likely outcome and cost of each alternative are carefully studied. What methods are available to prevent a particular disease?

 The fifth step. Once these alternative strategies are fully explored, an operational plan or programming is selected. The allocation of resources, authority, timetabling, and monitoring system is decided upon.

 The sixth step. The selected program or plan is then implemented and the collection of monitoring data is initiated. At this phase, the effects of the program on clients and on adjacent systems such as the housing and educational systems are also evaluated. Any deviation from the planned activities is sorted out and corrective measures are undertaken. Implementation requires effective organization and adequate resources.

The seventh step. The last step in the planning process is an evaluation, which might be applied at three stages of the planning process:

a. Before plan implementation: evaluation of the plan itself. Is it going to work and achieve the stated objectives?

b. During implementation (monitoring). Day-to-day follow-up of activities. Is the plan achieving the stated objectives?

c. At the end of the implementation: Final evaluation. Has the plan achieved the stated objectives?

   For evaluation purposes of disease prevention, one might suggest indicators of success like herd immunity, reduction in incidence, severity, or mortality due to the targeted disease (s).

List of Carbapenem (Meropenem or Imipenem or Ertapenem) Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Animals and Their Environment.

List of Carbapenem (Meropenem or Imipenem or Ertapenem, The last line antibiotics available for treatment) Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Animals and Their Environment

Full list is available at

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319872796_List_of_Carbapenem_Meropenem_or_Imipenem_or_Ertapenem_Resistant_Bacteria_Isolated_at_Epidemiology_Laboratory_of_Indian_Veterinary_Research_Institute_Izatnagar_India_from_April_2011_to_August_2017_from

Over last six years (April 2011 to August 2017), of the 2968 bacterial isolates from different clinically sick animals and their environment tested for their antimicrobial sensitivity (by disc diffusion assay and E-test as per CLSI), 480 were resistant to carbapenem drugs (meropenem or imipenem or ertapenem). On the further characterization of the 480 carbapenem-resistant bacteria, 124 were phenotypically characterized as Metallo-B-lactamase (MBL) producers using double disc diffusion assay and E-Test (for imipenem and imipenem+EDTA) and 51 were genotypically confirmed carrying one or more known Carbapenemase genes (Table 1). Of the 51 genotypically MBL positive 43 [Aeromonas jandaei (Leopard 1), Aeromonas popoffii (Cattle 2), Aeromonas trota (Cattle 1), Budvicia aquatica (Dog 1), Citrobacter freundii (Hospital sewage 1), Edwardsiella ictaluri (Leopard 1), Enterobacter agglomerans (Human 1, Food 1), Escherichia coli (Cattle 5, Dogs 9, Leopards 6, Pigs 9, Deer 1, Tiger 1), Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica (Chicks 1), Staphylococcus felis (Cattle 1), Staphylococcus xylosus (Dog 1)] were confirmed to carry New Delhi Metallo-B-lactamase (NDM), one Acinetobacter lowffii carried Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenmase (KPC), two Shewanella sp. strains were positive for Verona integrom mediate carbapenemase (VIM), four strains (2 of Escherichia coli, one each of Aeromonas bestiarum and Raoultella terrigena) carried OXA beta-lactamases (OXA) and one E. coli strain had both NDM and OXA on the plasmid. Seventy-three strains (Achromobacter sp., 1; Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, 1; Aeromonas hydrophila, 1; Alcaligenes faecalis, 1; Citrobacter freundii, 1; Enterobacter agglomerans, 2; Enterobacter sp., 1; Escherichia coli , 23; Klebsiella pneumoniae ssp. pneumoniae, 14; Proteus mirabilis, 9; Proteus vulgaris, 1; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 9; Pseudomonas sp., 2; Raoultella terrigena, 3; Roseomonas sp., 1; Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica, 1; Staphylococcus chromogenes, 1; Staphylococcus warneri, 1) were phenotypically MBL type but no MBL gene was detected using primers for reported genes (Table 2). Rest of the 356 carbapenem-resistant but negative for any of the known carbapenemase gene either genotypically or phenotypically belonged to more than 109 species of bacteria (Table 3).

Peste-des-petits-ruminants (PPR or goat plague) In India & National PPR Control Program

Peste-des-petits-ruminants (PPR),(goat plague) In India & National PPR Control Program 

1.1942 - PPR was first reported in Ivory Coast in West Africa (Gargadennec & Lalanne,          and subsequently in  sub-Saharan Africa (Senegal, Ghana, Togo, Benin and Nigeria), the Arabian Peninsula, the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent (Shaila et al., 1996)

2.1962 – PPRV first isolated in sheep cell culture

3.1986 - First confirmed outbreak in India in sheep in village Arasur in Villupuram district of  Tamil Nadu (Shaila et al., 1989).

4.First reported in North India from HP (1996).

5. Both the field strains were adapted in VERO cell and  attenuated vaccines have been developed

The National PPR Control Program was started in 2014 with an allocation of about 50 crore rupees per year. The out is perceptible by the following figures.

Distribution of PPR outbreaks in India

   2005–2013

The Efficacy of Vaccination in control of PPR in India

1. PPR is endemic in India in sheep & goats. 

2. Mainly young stocks are more affected. 

3.The disease occurs throughout the year but more common in October & March. 

4.Though vaccination is the only method for control & eradication. However, the vaccine is so good in India that the institute that developed so acclaimed effective vaccine in India to control the disease fear to use it because many a time outbreaks started on vaccination.

5.The other important reason for the persistence of disease is undeclared Policy of suppressed reporting of PPR outbreaks. 

Long Live Corruption and Animal Disease Control Programs in India.

Foot & Mouth Disease (FMD) Defied the Efforts of Government of India: The Solution मुँह पका खुर पका रोग (एफएमडी) ने भारत सरकार को पिलाया पानी: समस्या समाधान

Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Defied the Efforts of Government of India

मुँह पका खुर पका रोग (एफएमडी) ने भारत सरकार को पिलाया पानी

More details can be seen at https://www.slideshare.net/singh_br1762/foot-and-mouth-disease-an-indian-perspective-79478389
Fresh FMD attack January 2019, an outbreak in IVRI Bengaluru vaccine testing facility by type O FMDV. Administrators busy in hiding facts but--------. Since 15th January 2019 FMD outbreak is in devastating form at Central Institute for Research on Buffalo (CIRB, Hissar, Haryana) even after timely vaccination twice in a year.  
FMD is puzzling not only CIRB & IVRI animals but whole Karnataka, Tamilnadu, Haryana, Rajsthaan, and several other states in January 2019. Dependent experts are trying to find Pasteurella multocida to prove FMD as HS.
Experts also say that FMDV Involved in the outbreak is no different than used in the FMD vaccine.
See where and when outbreaks are reported to judge our honesty in reporting outbreaks as in UP officially no outbreak. http://www.nivedi.res.in/Nadres_v2/top_disease.php

 FMD is an economically important disease of cloven-footed animals. It causes an estimated loss of Rs. 20-22 thousand crores (per year to livestock owners in India. To control the disease, DAHDF of India launched a National FMD Control Program (FMD-CP) in 2003 with an outlay of about Rs. 500 crores a year by Central Government and each state government also invested an equally good amount of money. The program is ongoing all over India.
हर वर्ष 20 - 22 हज़ार करोड़ रुपये का चूना पशुपालकों को लगाने वाली इस बीमारी को कंट्रोल करने के लिए पिछले 15 वर्ष से भारत सरकार ने एक बहुत ही महत्व की योजना के तहत प्रति वर्ष लगभग 500 करोड़ रुपये और लगभग इतने ही राज्य सरकारों ने घोटालेबाजों को नज़र कर दिए और फल क्या मिला?  Bihar is worse affected (https://twitter.com/Minaksh66777374/status/993863500500889600).

The Results: 

The Failure of FMD-CP and wastage of Peoples hard earned money.
परिणाम: लौट के बुद्धू घर को आए या कि नौ दिन चले अडाई कोस या फिर यूँ कहो कि देश को चूना लगा दिया झूठे वैज्ञानिकों ने.

The Reasons:

1. Faulty planning

2. Corruption

3. Non-observance of tenets of disease control.

कारण:

1. ग़लत योजना

2. घोटाला संस्कृति

3. रोग निवारण के सिद्धांतों का अनियमन

Faulty selection of vaccine strains: Selection of the Vaccine strains should be based on epidemiological distribution the causal agent and it must be updated as soon as possible.

Serotype O, the vaccine strain, INDR2/1975 covers only 88% of the field isolates of O serotype causing outbreaks.

Serotype A, none of the isolates of this serotype from outbreaks showed a perfect match with the vaccine strain, IND40/2000 used in the vaccine.

Asia1 vaccine strain, IND63/1972, similar strains causing outbreaks in India was last recorded in the year 2000, i.e., the strain used in the vaccine has no or little utility.

वैक्सीन में प्रयुक्त स्ट्रेन्स का सही ना होना एक बड़ी समस्या है: समय पर वैक्सीन स्ट्रेन्स का चुनाव न करना आज वैक्सीन फैल होने का बड़ा कारण हो सकता है परंतु रोग के हर कारक विषाणु की जाँच ना होना इस समस्या का एक बड़ा कारण है.

Let us see the Tenets of Disease control and how are they been flouted by the planners.

रोग नियंत्रण के सिद्धांतों को कैसे मखोल बनाया गया है.

No doubt FMD control is a very difficult task but international efforts made in different parts of the world have shown the path in lucidity. The OIE has framed a Progressive Control Program for FMD (PCP-FMD) where the essentials are mentioned as under:

• Strengthening Veterinary services: Either effort is not made or made half-hearted or made to destroy the services. Without strong veterinary services, no disease control program can be implemented towards success.

• Effective surveillance and alert systems: It is in primitive stage and in hands of those who have no or little experience.

• Quality controlled vaccines (OIE standards) Vaccine matching Vaccine banks Vaccine quality control centres Vaccination strategies: massive, targeted: There is only one Centre to monitor the quality of vaccine to ensure the monopoly. There in India is a foolproof system to harass honest officials if they report about the poor quality of the vaccine.

• Updated Legislation: All over the world culling of diseased animals is practised to protect the healthy ones but legislation in India are humanitarian and you can not get rid of the diseased cattle in India.

• Use of OIE standards: We believe on Made in India and Make in India standards.

• Communication strategies: Communication of truth is the essence of knowledge and knowledge is dangerous for the propagation of corruption, thus only biased communication is permitted.

•Rapid disease reporting is essential to control an FMD outbreak. In India, administrators ensure through all the measures to hide the reports.

•After an outbreak, tracing must be done through epidemiologic inquiries to help identify the source of disease introduction. In India, administrators ensure through all the measures to prevent entry of the Epidemiologist in the scene.

•Where mass slaughter is not possible, strict quarantining and movement restriction should be enforced. In India, administrators ensure through all the measures to get rid of sick animals as soon as possible through auction.

•However, quarantine may not be long enough to prevent carrier animal movement after an outbreak. In India, administrators ensure through all the measures to move the diseased animals out of their administrative regions.

•The dead infected carcasses must be disposed of via incineration, burial, or rendering on or close to the infected premises. In India, you may not see any such practice.

•Scavengers and rodents should be prevented or killed to prevent mechanical dissemination of the virus. In India, you may not see any such practice.

•Buildings should be cleaned with a mild acid or alkali disinfectant and fumigation, and people that have come into contact with the virus may be asked to decontaminate their clothing and avoid contact with susceptible animals for a period of time. In India, you may not see any such practice.

•FMD persistence in wildlife populations can make FMD eradication unrealistic. Control measures, such as fencing of wildlife reserves to prevent contact with domestic livestock may help to limit the spread of the virus in certain areas. In India, you may not see any such practice because when it is not possible to protect humans from wild-life invading in urban areas and getting killed the question of protecting livestock is a far-fetched dream.

•Investigation of all FMD outbreaks: Instead of investigation efforts are made to hide the outbreaks.

A solution to the Problem:

1. Redrafting of the program with the experts in Epidemiology specifically those who are practising epidemiology and certainly not by the so-called experts sitting in the big chairs.

2. Ensuring the quality vaccine by creating multiple centres for quality control and abolishing the prevailing monopoly system.

3. Ensuring the punishment for those supplying and clearing the substandard vaccines.

4. Punishing those hiding the FMD or FMD like diseases in the livestock and other animals.

5. Rewarding the Veterinarians for reporting the FMD and FMD like diseases in animals and being proactive in the truthful investigation of the disease incidences and outbreaks.

6. Ensuring the implementation of available legislation towards disease control.

7. Bringing some suitable legislation targetted for disease control in animals leaving the political and religious taboos aside. We can permit the sacrifice of animals for religious causes but prohibit scientific culling for disease control and healthy society. 

8. To educate the society about disease control methods using scientific animal husbandry.

9. Strengthening of Veterinary services which are still in infancy in most parts of India.

10. Education for cleanliness and hygiene. Though Swachchhata Abhiyan is on, it needs to holistic and in the syllabus of primary education.

 समस्या का समाधान 

1.  जानपदिक रोगों के जानकारों द्वारा ना की उँची उँची कुर्सियों पर बैठे बेईमानों द्वारा योजना का नवीनीकरण.
2.  वैक्सीन की जाँच के लिए कई केन्द्र बनाकर वैक्सीन की जाँच में एकाधिकार के कारण घोटाले की समाप्ति.
3. खराब गुणवत्ता की वैक्सीन बनाने वालों, बेचने वालों, उसे पास करने वालों के लिए फाँसी की सज़ा का प्रावधान
4. रोग को छुपाने वाले पशु पालकों, पशु चिकित्सकों एवं अधिकारियों के विरुद्ध कड़ी सज़ा का प्रावधान
5. रोग को जल्द पहचाहनकर जल्दी से जल्दी जाँच कराने वाले पशु पालकों, पशु चिकित्सकों एवं अधिकारियों को पुरूस्कृत करने का प्रावधान
6. रोग नियंत्रण के लिए उपलब्ध क़ानूनों क़ा पालन सुनिश्चित करके
7. रोग नियंत्रण के लिए धार्मिक एवं राजनीतिक कारकों को एक ओर रख कर नये एवं प्रभावी नियम-क़ानून बनाकर. यहॉं धर्म के नाम पर पशु बली हो सकती है पर समाज को रोगों से बचाने के लिए वैज्ञानिक तरीके पशु को बलिदान करना मना है.
8. समाज में वैज्ञानिक तरीके से रोग नियंत्रण के तरीकों को प्राथमिक शिक्षा के द्वारा प्रसार करके.
9. देश में पशु-चिकित्सा सेवाओं में सुधार करके.
10. साफ सफाई से रहने के तरीकों को प्राथमिक शिक्षा में शामिल करके और स्वच्च्छ भारत अभियान को संपूर्णता प्रदान करके.