What is the IT cell? It is a misinformation group of politically motivated people using a psychological fact: "When those in your social circle share misinformation, you are more likely to believe it and share it. Misinformation multiplies, and science denial grows." Politicians use this fact to keep people blind to the facts. Every political party has created such groups, called IT Cells. We must be careful of these groups, and we often fail to recognize when we fall into their trap. My goal is never to criticize or insult anyone, but I always try to add some humor to scientific explanations so they aren’t boring, as science can sometimes seem.
How can you protect yourself from falling prey to the IT Cell?
1. Learn to slow down and observe your quick, intuitive responses—"System 1 thinking." Instead, activate the rational, analytical part of your mind—"System 2"—and ask yourself, "How do I know this is true? Is it plausible? Why do I think it is true?" Then do some fact-checking. Don’t accept information at face value if it confirms what you already believe, which is called Confirmation Bias in epidemiology.
2. Some people see things dualistically: there’s always a clear right or wrong. But scientists view tentativeness as a core part of their discipline. They understand that scientific claims can change, and today’s scientific knowledge may not stay true tomorrow. Journalists sometimes exaggerate this by presenting "both sides” of settled scientific agreements, trying to persuade readers that science is more uncertain than it actually is, turning balance into bias, known as observer bias.
3. Understand that others—or even yourself—may operate under misguided beliefs about science. We can help ourselves by adopting a scientific attitude—being open to new evidence and willing to change our minds.
You might think that how you interpret a simple graph depends on your socio-political views. But when you look at the same chart again, you might be surprised. There’s an unconscious bias toward your preferred interpretation, and honestly, I often struggle with this myself.
4. Recognize the role emotions play in decisions about science. You might react strongly to a story about stem cells used to develop Parkinson’s treatments. Ask yourself: Are you overly hopeful because you have a loved one in the early stages of the disease? Or are you rejecting a potentially lifesaving treatment because of your feelings? Feelings shouldn’t be separated from how you think about science. Instead, understand that emotions are fully integrated into how we think and learn about science. That is emotional bias.
5. We often hold multiple social identities—like mother, grandmother, or friend—and each one influences our decisions. So, try to listen more and act less, but act decisively and at the right moment. When one identity blocks your acceptance of scientific facts, use another identity to help create a connection.
Hope I haven't made this too boring.
Source for some part of the views expressed here: https://www.psychologytoday.
