Sunday, December 11, 2016

Game is on: Acts of treachery by Dr. Gaya Prasad, VC of SVBP Agric. & Technology University, Modi Puram, Meerut घोटाला जारी है: ईमानदार डा. गया प्रसाद के काले कारनामे और सफेद झूठ

The Game is on, Acts of treachery by so-called honest Dr. Gaya Prasad, VC of SVBP Agric. and Technology University, Modi Puram, Meerut 

As per RTI information:
The vaccine of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) found substandard at CCSNIAH Baghpat in November 2014 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267705649_Testing_of_FMD_Vaccine_intended_to_be_used_under_FMD-CP_of_Govt_of_India_at_CCS_NIAH_Baghpat_UP_India) was retested at IVRI Izatnagar, Bareilly under directions of chairman of the committee Dr. Gaya Prasad, presently VC at SVBP Agric. & Technology University, Modi Puram, Meerut.
Retesting of FMD vaccine completed on 6th February 2015 and report was submitted to Dr. Gaya Prasad by email. However, the final report in favour of producers of sub-standard FMD vaccine was submitted by Dr. Gaya Prasad on 12 January 2015, almost 25 days before the completion of testing and submission of the testing report.

How? Why? What for? Does he become VC in return of the fraudulent report?

Why on this corruption ICAR & Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers welfare is sitting quietly? Do they are also getting the share from the corruption?
 The losses every to farmers of India were estimated to be more than twenty thousand crores per year a few years back and Indian Government spent thousands of crores every year since 2003 on FMD vaccine and FMD control with the outcome of frequent vaccine failures and FMD outbreaks all over India?
This is one face of corruption in the regime of the so-called honest Government of Honest Modi.

घोटाला जारी है: ईमानदार डागया प्रसाद के काले कारनामे और सफेद झूठ
RTI में प्राप्त जानकारी के अनुसार:
उस घटिया मुँह पका खुर पका रोग (FMD) वैक्सीन की (जिसकी रिपोर्ट CCSNIAH बागपत से नवेंबर 2014 में दी थी https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267705649_Testing_of_FMD_Vaccine_intended_to_be_used_under_FMD-CP_of_Govt_of_India_at_CCS_NIAH_Baghpat_UP_India और उसकी पुनजाँच के लिए डागया प्रसादजो आजकल कुलपति SVBP कृषि विश्वविद्यालय मेरठ के कुलपतिहैं कमेटी बनी थी) IVRI इज़्ज़त नगर में जाँच 6 फ़रवरी 2015 को पूरी हुई थी, और रिपोर्ट 7 फ़रवरी 2015 को ईमेल द्वारा भेजी गई थी, परंतु डागद्दार प्रसाद ने घातक वैक्सीन बनाने वाली कंपनियों के हित में रिपोर्ट 12 जनवरी 2015 को ही जमा कर दी (जाँच रिपोर्ट आने के लगभग 25 दिन पहले)
कैसेक्यूँक्या ख़ाकेक्या उसी के इनाम में उन्हें कुलपति बनाया गया?
इस घोटाले पर कृषि मंत्रालय और भाकृषि अनुपरिषद कुंडली मारकर क्यों बैठे हैं? क्या उन्हे भी गद्दार कंपनियों से हिस्सा मिल रहा है?
मुँह पका खुर पका रोग से अनुमानित हानि प्रतिवर्ष 20,000 करोड़ से ज़्यादा होती है और हज़ारों करोड़ हर वर्ष भारत सरकार और प्रदेश सरकारें इसकी रोकथाम पर पिछ्ले 13 सालों से खर्च करती  रही हैं.
आश्चर्य ये नहीं है कि घोटाला हो रहा है क्योंकि ये तो देश की पहचान हैआश्चर्य इस बात पर है कि खेल उस रेफरी की देखरेख में भी जारी है जिसे हमईमानदार मोदी कहतें हैंजिन्हें इस घोटाले के बारे में जाने कितने बार कितने ढंग से लिखा जा चुका हैक्या होगा इस देश के पशु पालकों काक्या ऐसे ही दशकोंधोखा खाते रहेंगे जैसे खाते  रहे हैं?


Thursday, December 8, 2016

Substandard Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine in India and its side effects: Sleeping administration

Substandard Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine in India and its side effects: Sleeping administration
प्रिय मित्रों, आपको जानकार हर्ष होगा कि दुनिया में 4500 से ज़्यादा लोग उस रिपोर्ट को पढ़ चुके हैं जिसमें हमने भारत में प्रयोग होने वाली मुँह पका खुर पका (FMD) वैक्सीन की गुणवत्ता के बारे में बताया था. और 1500 से ज़्यादा लोगों ने उस रिपोर्ट को पढ़ा और डाउनलोड किया जिसमें बताया गाया था कि किस तरह ILL हैदराबाद की बनी हुई FMD वैक्सीन लगने के बाद भी भारतीय पशु चिकित्सा अनुसंधान में FMD फैली और 4 दर्जन से भी ज़्यादा बहुमूल्य पशु वैक्सीन लगने के एक महीने के अंदर ही FMD से मार गये. आपके लिए भी यह सब जानना देश हित में, किसानों के हित में और पशुओं के भले के लिए जानना ज़रूरी है जिससे खराब गुणवत्ता की वैक्सीन उत्पादक कंपनियों की लूट को शीघ्रतशीघ्र रोका जा सके.
Dear friends, you will be happy to know that more than 4500 people all over the world have read and downloaded our report on substandard Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) vaccine used to bluff farmers of India (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267705649_Testing_of_FMD_Vaccine_intended_to_be_used_under_FMD-CP_of_Govt_of_India_at_CCS_NIAH_Baghpat_UP_India) and more than 1500 people tried to understand how IIL made FMD vaccine failed in premiere institute of veterinary research (IVRI) leading to death of more than four dozens of precious animals (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306324222_Epidemiology_and_Statistics_of_Indian_Veterinary_Research_Institute_Dairy_during_Foot_and_Mouth_Disease_FMD_Outbreak_in_January-February_2016). You need to understand it too to save the nation, to save the farmers and to save the animals from sufferings from the ongoing loot by producers of substandard vaccine.

Monday, December 5, 2016

Is it possible to have Disease-Free zones in India or we should go for disease resistant livestock?

Feasibility of Disease free zone(s) in India! A truth or another misleading concept?

भारत में रोग मुक्त छेत्र! कितना सपना, कितना संभव? कितना सच, कितना झूठ?
कितना आसान है बीमारी मुक्त पशु धन उत्पादन? क्या हम बीमारी मुक्त छेत्र (भारत सरकार का सपना) बना पाएँगे? या फिर रोग प्रतिरोधी पशुधन की प्रजातियाँ बना पाएँगे? रास्ता कठिन और लंबा है परंतु भ्रष्टाचार के जमाने में लगभग असंभव.
कुछ समय पहले चिड़ियाँ जो बीमारिमुक्त वातावरण में उत्पन्न करने का दावा करने वाली कंपनी ने सप्लाई की थीं उसी बीमारी से भा. पशु अनु. चि. स. में मर गईं जिस बीमारी से कंपनी द्वारा मुक्ति का दावा था. उस से पहले बीमारी प्रतिरोधी पक्षियों की प्रजाति का परीक्षण सालमोनेल्ला नामक जीवाणु के लिये किया गया था उसके परिणाम जानने के लिंक पर जाएँ.
आपके विचार आमंत्रित हैं, यदि ओपनली शेयर ना करना चाहें तो ईमेल (brs1762@ivri.res.in) पर शेयर करें. आपकी अति कृपा होगी.
Is it better and possible to raise the specific pathogen resistant birds? Is this may be an option for specific disease free zone? The pathway is long and tortuous but------. https://www.researchgate.net/…/260186002_Genetic_resistance…https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260186002_Genetic_resistance_of_guinea_fowls_to_Salmonella_Gallinarum_Infection
Is plan of Government to create disease free zones for specific pathogens all over India, not another money mending mechanism created by scientists (so called)? In recent past, several lots of SPF (specific pathogen free) birds (supplied by a renowned company) died in Indian Veterinary Research Institute spoiling planned experiments with the pathogen for which birds were raised in SPF zone. The options are limited for disease control in light of corruption in the system. However, the idea to raise genetically disease resistant livestock may be promising. In an experiment, such birds were tested. How those birds behave when exposed to Salmonella, a deadly pathogen of birds?

Your views are requested.
If not want to share your views openly, please send on email: brs1762@ivri.res.in

Friday, December 2, 2016

What should be done with the traitors of India, Cheaters of Farmers of India?

What should be done with the traitors of India, Cheaters of Farmers of India?
Why should one file a suit against Dr. RK Singh (Director IVRI) and Dr. AK Tiwari (Head of Division of Standardization), Dr. Gaya Prasad (VC, SVBP Univ of Agric and Tech. Modipuram, Meerut)?
During the enquiry against report of Director CCS National Institute of Animal Health (CCSNIAH), Baghpat (UP) on substandard Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) vaccine supplied under FMD control programme (FMD CP) of Govt. of India (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267705649_Testing_of_FMD_Vaccine_intended_to_be_used_under_FMD-CP_of_Govt_of_India_at_CCS_NIAH_Baghpat_UP_India) run by Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries (DADF) the enquiry committee chaired by Dr. Gaya Prasad ordered to re-test the vaccine tested at CCSNIAH. To benefit the companies producing substandard vaccine these people did the following crime:
1.        They have not tested the samples of vaccine tested at CCSNIAH or the samples of the same lot kept reserved at IVRI, Bengaluru.
2.        They have not tested the samples collected from the vaccines of the same batches supplied to veterinary hospitals all over India.
3.        They collected the samples (without any authority to collect the samples i.e., collected by unauthorized people) directly from the companies with prior information (or received the samples from companies) as a gift, as per rule samples were not purchased, not collected in required numbers (quantity).
4.        The samples (if any collected) were tested at IVRI, Izatnagar, a laboratory not authorized by Drug controller general of India (DCGI) required as per rule.
5.        After testing samples were destroyed (without any permission).
6.        As per RTI information samples were tested up to 2nd February 2015 but the final report was submitted by Dr. Gaya Prasad on 13th January 2015 (16 days before the completion of testing). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Madhanmohan_Muthukrishnan/publication/275045724_GoI_Expert_Committee_clears_FMD_vaccine_Manufacturers_report_2015pdf/data/5531f0550cf2f2a588ad63d5/GoI-Expert-Committee-clears-FMD-vaccine-Manufacturers-report-2015.pdf
7.        Dr. Gaya Prasad submitted report mentioning dozens of lies like 
a.        Institute (CCSNIAH) was not ordered for testing the vaccine, the institute is the single mandate to test the vaccine. Does to do mandate activity Director CCSNIAH needed the permission?
b.        CCSNIAH had no facility to test the vaccine, the Institute facility was accredited by the committee and every year Govt of India spends crores on maintenance and running the facility, why it is?
c.        Scientists/ staff of CCSNIAH were not involved in the testing of the vaccine when reports by scientists were submitted to Gaya Prasad why he lied?
For every word in the text above we have authentic proof, if you are ready to file the case the proofs can be given to you also.
The FMD vaccine by the same company (Indian Immunologicals Ltd. Hyderabad) failed before the report from CCSNIAH in whole South India, NDRI Karnal, and Chennai Veterinary College Dairy Farm, and after testing the vaccine failed in IVRI, Izatnagar (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306324222_Epidemiology_and_Statistics_of_Indian_Veterinary_Research_Institute_Dairy_during_Foot_and_Mouth_Disease_FMD_Outbreak_in_January-February_2016), and nearby areas, Military Dairy Farm Meerut, in Rajasthan at Ganganagar and recently at GADVASU Ludhiana (Punjab Veterinary Institute). But nobody is there to question these three people who cleared the vaccine which was substandard, nobody is there to ask for what they turned traitors, why they cheated farmers of India?
Related Links: 
 Who will come forward to help the truth, to help the farmers of India or everybody has sold the conscience and is a traitor at heart but Nationalist to show the people?

Waiting for response.
Sincerely yours
BR Singh

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Andhra Pradesh is declared FMD Free State: Is decision justified, and not a hasty one? 
In 2013-14 there were 14 outbreaks of FMD in Andhra Pradesh (PDFMD annual report). “The foot-and-mouth disease project directorate’s 2013-14 annual report says that nearly 50% of foot-and-mouth outbreaks in India occurred in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu. These four states are fully covered by the foot-and-mouth disease control program.” http://www.animals24-7.org/…/foot-and-mouth-disease-spread…/

There was an outbreak in goats too, a Malignant form of foot and mouth disease outbreak in sheep and goat with reference to cytological and histopathological findings. (8 goats died in 2013-14).https://www.researchgate.net/…/280762378_Malignant_form_of_… 

An interesting fact is just after two years Andhra Pradesh is declared FMD free state, despite the fact that after a big outbreak disease does not occur for about two years due to naturally acquired immunity, and cattle may remain a carrier for years together.

The decision appears to be in haste with some ulterior motives but lets us all pray to the God for the persistence of FMD free status of Andhra Pradesh.

The decision was in haste, has been proved by the widespread outbreak in Andhra Pradesh and nearby states in December 2016, just after a few months of the declaration of freedom.
Even today (23-2-17) I received a call from Andhra-Telangana about the continuance of the outbreak in many parts.

Monday, September 5, 2016

What I requested to DG ICAR, New Delhi on 5th September 2016 in Substandard Foot and Mouth Disease matter?

What I requested to DG ICAR, New Delhi on 5th September 2016 in Substandard Foot and Mouth Disease matter?
In FMD vaccine testing matter, what I requested to DG Indian Council of Agriculture Research in the meeting on 5th September 2016.
1. Why FMD outbreaks even after vaccination and within a month of vaccination with IIL FMD Vaccine at:
a. IVRI, Izatnagar in January 2016.
b. In NDRI Karnal.
c. In TANUVAS, Chennai.
d. In Military Dairy Farm, Meerut (2016) and at several other places.
Sir, through your kind self I want answers for the following questions from Division of Animal Sciences and specifically Director IVRI, Izatnagar:
2. Why there was FMD Outbreak with more than 4 dozens of deaths despite FMD vaccination?
3. Why not any action has been taken against IIL, Hyderabad, the FMD vaccine supplier?
4. Why IVRI, Izatnagar is not testing the vaccines as per Indian Pharmacopeia (IP) though claiming to follow IP, is it not to benefit the producers of substandard vaccines?
5. Why all the rules of sampling and testing vaccine were thwarted to favour IIL, Hyderabad?
6. Why the copy of the report by Dr. Gaya Prasad (then ADG, AH) against my testing has not been provided to me despite several requests? Moreover, without any letter or communication to me, the stern action was recommended by the Division of Animal Sciences against me. Why the Dr. Gaya Prasad report was given to IIL and DADF, though they are distantly related to ICAR?
7. Why the rules for publishing research/ report are different for different people as:
8. Dr. RK Singh, now Director IVRI, Izatnagar published two papers with IIL, Hyderabad without any permission and at that time he was not Director, he was just Principal Scientist.
Similarly B. Pattnaik, now Director, PDFMD, also published papers with IIL Hyderabad without permission from any higher authority.
If “a” and “b” are true then why permission was necessary for Dr. Bhoj Raj Singh being Director of the Institute for publishing the report of substandard FMD vaccine? Probably because the truth is not liked by Division of Animal Sciences at ICAR and they were hand in gloves with producers of the substandard vaccine?
9. Why FMD outbreak occurred by FMD virus type “A” in IVRI when vaccination was going on with IIL FMD vaccine? This virus was neither there (nearby Bareilly) nor in UP (it was only Type “O”)? Why was it not allowed to be investigated By Division of Epidemiology despite request? At the time of the outbreak statement from IVRI was issued that disease might have come from nearby villages, but they never questioned the vaccine, why?
10. When has IVRI transferred FMD vaccine technology (http://ivri.nic.in/ITMU/MajorAchievements.aspx) to three firms (only four firms in India are producing FMD vaccine) then why it said to you that technology is of not IVRI (as communicated by you in the earlier meeting)?
11. Why there are deaths due to FMD, Brucellosis, Tuberculosis, PPR and Pasteurellosis on IVRI, Izatnagar Livestock farms? If these diseases cannot be prevented at IVRI, Izatnagar how Division of Animal Sciences approved the program for the National Control programs on control of Brucellosis, FMD & PPR? Is it not treachery to Indian farmers? Or it is just to benefit the vaccine producers.
12. Why IVRI is auctioning the cows after abortion (most of the abortions are due to Brucellosis and animals become lifetime spreader after disease), is it to spread the disease to all parts of India so that more and more need for vaccination can be shown?
13. PPR Vaccine technology is also of IVRI but in last five years, several times hundreds of goats have died due to PPR only after vaccination, why?

Sir, the reply to the above queries may reveal how Director IVRI is hand in gloves with IIL, Hyderabad that has filed a case against me to punish me for revealing the truth.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Enrofloxacin Addition in FMD vaccine: An anti-national act


An Anti-National Act of Dr. Gaya Prasad Committee on FMD Vaccine quality issue formed by GOI (ICAR) wrote that "Enrofloxacin Addition in FMD vaccine is legal and with no undesirable effects"
The Committee wrote in their report (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267705649_Testing_of_FMD_Vaccine_intended_to_be_used_under_FMD-CP_of_Govt_of_India_at_CCS_NIAH_Baghpat_UP_India?ev=post) on FMD Vaccine Quality at page 9 at point 4: “Ït was informed by the manufacturer that the use of enrofloxacin as a preservative was permitted by DCGI (Annexure 7). The Committee was told that the concentration used does not have undesirable effects.”
From this statement, it is apparent that they believed on the manufacturer of the substandard vaccine adulterated with unethically permitted antibiotic as the preservative. They neither did any search, nor research nor had any knowledge. They went to the extremes to support the addition of the antibiotics (in low doses) which may destroy the ecology, environment and coming generations of India. They become blind or got blinded with ----power, only Dr. Gaya Prsad can explain the reasons for his blindness.
If they would have read even the single drug datasheet of enrofloxacin (https://animalhealth.bayer.com/ah/fileadmin/media/baytril/pdf_companion/kap6.pdf) from mother company (Bayer) then they would have changed their view. But the committee was made illiterate by the corporate power.
I request you to read the following lines from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.aavpt.org/resource/resmgr/imported/fluoroquinolones.pdf
Federal law prohibits the extra-label (non-intended use) use of fluoroquinolones in food-producing animals (21 CFR 530.41). The prohibition is based on a finding by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that the extra-label use of these antibiotics in food-producing animals presents a risk to the public health because it could increase the level of drug-resistant zoonotic pathogens at the time of slaughter. Some researchers are concerned that such use can lead to the transfer of pathogens resistant to fluoroquinolones from animals to human beings. Food animals including, all pigs, feedlot cattle and, animals that are not members of a species routinely used for food production would also be considered food-producing animals if they or their products are processed for human consumption.
But in India neither animals nor human lives are valuable; it seems to be the country of money-money and money, of corporate houses and of traitors.
Extra-label drug use (ELDU) means "actual use or intended use of a drug in an animal in a manner that is not in accordance with the approved labelling. This includes, but is not limited to, use in species not listed in the labeling, use for indications (disease or other conditions) not listed in the labeling, use at dosage levels, frequencies, or routes of administration other than those stated in the labeling, and deviation from the labeled withdrawal time based on these different uses." (http://www.farad.org/eldu/eldumain.asp; http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/ActsRulesRegulations/ucm085377.htm). And to your surprise, you may not find the use of enrofloxacin as a preservative. The enrofloxacin is “- Only labelled for non-lactating dairy animals twenty months of age or less and beef animals for pneumonia.” (See page 21 of the link: http://www.nationaldairyfarm.com/sites/default/files/2015-Residue-Manual-WEB.pdf) and is not approved in lactating dairy cattle 20 months of age or older (page 52 of the above link).
Dr. Dr. Clell V. Bagley, D.V.M. wrote (http://extension.usu.edu/dairy/files/uploads/htms/drugs.htm) “Fluoroquinolones - Although data have not been sufficiently conclusive to prevent approval of sarafloxacin for chickens and beef cattle, it prompted FDA-CVM to prohibit the extra-label use of these compounds in 1997. Fluoroquinolone products labelled for either humans or companion animals may not be used in food animals. Any deviation from a food animal label (such as use with a different species, dosage, route of administration, or disease indication) is similarly illegal. In the case of the approved beef cattle formulation of enrofloxacin (Baytril 100), this prohibition extends to all non-beef-production animals, including lactating and nonlactating dairy cows, heifer replacements, and veal calves. Enrofloxacin may not be stored in dairy farm drug cabinets”.
The fluoroquinolones were the first group of antimicrobials prohibited from extra-label use by the FDA because of their potential for creating antimicrobial-resistant strains that posed a threat to human health. The FDA banned the extra-label use of fluoroquinolones in 1997. Not only in dairy animals FDA, in 2005, withdrew the approval for enrofloxacin products in poultry and effectively made use of these drugs in poultry species illegal (http://www.farad.org/publications/digests/092009ProhibitedDrugsUpdated.pdf).
The dangers of enrofloxacin use in animals even those are not food animals are as under (http://www.wedgewoodpetrx.com/learning-center/professional-monographs/enrofloxacin-for-veterinary-use.html):
Enrofloxacin and the other fluoroquinolones antibiotics can cause developmental cartilage abnormalities. As a consequence, most veterinarians try to avoid these drugs in young animals.
• Enrofloxacin should be used with caution or avoided in animals at risk for seizures. This drug is not used in humans due to central nervous system stimulation.
• Enrofloxacin should not be used for regional antibiotic perfusion because it is too irritating and will cause vasculitis.
• In Dogs: GI side-effects including vomiting, diarrhoea and elevated liver enzymes; Rare CNS signs including ataxia, seizures, depression, and anxiety, not recommended in pups.
• In Cats: GI side effects include vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia, elevated liver enzymes. CNS signs include ataxia, seizures, depression, vocalization, and aggression. Rare ocular toxicity may occur.
• In Horses: As Injection, it is highly irritant and when given orally it can cause mucous membrane irritation, redness, slobbering, and swelling.
• All food animals: Prohibited

                    Dear Friends, low dosages of antibiotics are even more dangerous than the therapeutic use of the antibiotics because “Low doses of antibiotics can stimulate the formation of bacterial biofilms that lead to chronic lung, sinus, and ear infections. The biofilms can grow stronger instead of weaker in presence of the antibiotics. The emergence of drug-resistant bacteria is a global challenge and is an outcome of the irregular and subtherapeutic use of antibiotics besides several other factors.

            So be careful and think twice about the explanation of Dr. Gaya Prasad Committee, either its addition into FMD vaccine supported by the committee is wise or anti-national.

The common adverse effects of Fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin etc, FQ) include gastrointestinal disorders as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and abdominal cramps. Besides, skin rashes, allergies, and photosensitivity are also frequently seen. Some less common complications of FQ use are neutropenia, eosinophilia, and elevated liver enzymes (1-4%) but luckily all are reversible with proper post-therapeutic care (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668199/). Several studies associated arthropathy in kids after use of FQ in growing age up to 18 years.
In a study in 2003, Chalumeau and co-workers reported (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12777590) from a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study that compared potential adverse events in 276 pediatric patients who received FQs and 249 matched controls who received an antibiotic agent other than FQ. The chances for potential adverse events in the FQ group were 3.7 times more than the non-FQ group. The most commonly affected systems were the gastrointestinal followed by musculoskeletal (arthralgias of large joints or myalgias but no tendinopathy), skin, and central nervous systems.
The recent model list of essential drugs prepared by the WHO includes only 340 items and 532 formulations of which only 12 are FDCs(2). The combination of metronidazole and norfloxacin does not figure in this list (https://www.indianpediatrics.net/sep1998/sep-941-942.htm), but in India, you may find in almost every pediatric prescription (http://www.drugsupdate.com/brand/showavailablebrands/631), often as the first drug of life.

When the use of FQs is permitted?
Even the most studies supporting the use of fluoroquinolones to cure septic cases in kids when no other alternative is left agree with the bad effects of fluoroquinolones in kids (http://www.jwatch.org/em200712210000003/2007/12/21/should-we-prescribe-fluoroquinolone-antibiotics).

FQs are approved by FDA and EU (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21949152; https://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/files/paediatrics/2012-09_pediatric_report-annex1-2_en.pdf; http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/referrals/Ciprofloxacin_Bayer/human_referral_000024.jsp) for use in children for emergency use for the treatment of inhalation anthrax, complicated urinary tract infections, and pyelonephritis and cystic fibrosis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. WHO permits FQs (http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/9241546700/en/) for the treatment of life-threatening bacterial infections, such as resistant tuberculosis, dysentery, and cholera, with the caution that uses these nasty antibiotics if the benefits outweigh the risk of arthropathy. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) suggest the use of FQs for treatment of multidrug-resistant infections for which there is no safe and effective alternative, and when parenteral therapy is not feasible and no other effective oral agent is available (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16951028).
 But who cares in India, paediatricians are prescribing these FQ drugs indiscriminately even giving any second thought and using it as the first line of treatment which otherwise should be the last option.