Mockery of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and PCICDA Act-2009 by Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare: गौ-हत्या निरोधक कानून और संक्रामक रोग प्रतिरोधक कानून (PCICDA Act) 2009 का मजाक बनाता भारतीय कृषि एवं कृषक कल्याण मंत्रालय

Mockery of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and PCICDA Act-2009 by Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare

गौ-हत्या निरोधक कानून और संक्रामक रोग प्रतिरोधक कानून (PCICDA Act) 2009 का मजाक बनाता भारतीय कृषि एवं कृषक कल्याण मंत्रालय 

क्या भारत सरकार को गौरक्षा सम्बंधित कानून और संक्रामक रोग प्रतिरोधक कानून (PCICDA Act-2009) पर पुनः विचार करना चाहिए? वर्तमान परिस्थितियों जहाँ ज्यादातर सरकारी पशुपालन केंद्रों/ डेरियों पर इन कानूनों की धज्जियाँ उड़ाई जा रही हैं उससे तो यही लगता है.  डा. कीर्ति कुमार शर्मा, जो कई मिलिट्री पशु फार्मों के कमांडिंग अफसर रह चुके हैं और अभी हेमपुर फार्म में हैं, के विचार यहाँ उद्धृत हैं जो एक सरकारी वर्ग को प्रतिनिधित्व देते हैं.

Do India needs to reconsider the implementation of the Prevention of Cow slaughter Act and The Prevention and Control of Infectious and Contagious Diseases in Animals Act, of 2009? These Acts are made a mockery at most Government Livestock Farms, as a representative of many of the commanding Government officials, the thoughts of  Dr. Kirti Kumar Sharma, now in Incharge Military Farm at Hempur are cited here.

It is not only the mockery of the Prevention of Cow slaughter Acts but the sale/ auction of diseased animals suffering from Scheduled Infectious diseases including Bovine Tuberculosis, Paratuberculosis (Johne’s Disease), and Brucellosis, FMD, appears that the Institutes intentionally spread the infectious and contagious diseases to faraway places. All these acts are punishable under different sections of The Prevention and Control of Infectious and Contagious Diseases in Animals (PCICDA) Act, 2009. Further, the institutes are engaged in faulty passing of diagnostics and vaccines to control infectious and contagious diseases, that is intentionally spreading such scheduled diseases (Brucellosis, Foot and Mouth Disease, Paratuberculosis, Bovine tuberculosis, PPR, Glanders, Classical swine fever, New Castle disease/ Ranikhet Disease, Sheep and Goat pox, etc.) to each and every nook and corner of India.
Section 25 of the (PCICDA) Act, 2009 suggests resorting to euthanasia for infected animals.—If the Veterinary Officer deems it necessary that an animal, is infected with a scheduled disease, euthanasia has to be resorted to, for preventing the spread of the disease to other animals in the area or to protect public health if the disease is of zoonotic importance, he may, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, by an order in writing, direct euthanasia of the animal and the carcass disposed of immediately to his satisfaction. But in No case sale of diseased animals.

Section 5 of the PCICDA Act defines the Duty of the owner to segregate infected animals. 1.     Every owner or person in charge of an animal, which he has reason to believe is infective of a scheduled disease, shall segregate such animal and have it kept in a place away from all other animals which are healthy, and take all possible steps to prevent the infected animal from coming in contact with any other animal. 2.     The owner or other person in charge of, or having control over, the animal referred to in sub-section (1) shall confine that animal and prevent it from grazing in a commonplace or drinking water from any common source including a vessel, pond, lake or river. 3.     All other infected animals shall be segregated by the Municipality, Panchayat, or other local administration. However, IVRI had neither segregated nor quarantined such animals but sold them to Farmers which could not properly understand the seriousness of the problem. This heinous act of the institute further contravened the provision under Section 11. Precautionary measures in relation to controlled areas. No person shall take out of the controlled area- a.     any animal, alive or dead, which is infected with, or reasonably suspected to have been infected with, any scheduled disease notified under sub-section (1) of section 6, b.    any kind of fodder, bedding, or other material which has come into contact with any animal infected with such disease or could, in any manner, carry the infection of the notified disease, or(c) the carcass, skin, or any other part or product of such animal. By arranging an auction of animals at the Institute in January 2016 when PPR and FMD outbreak was there in the institute, the Institute also flawed the provision of the Act under Section13 Prohibition of bringing infected animals into the market and other places. Section 23 of the Act directs a.    to keep it segregated from other apparently healthy animals, or b.    to subject it to such treatment as may be required under the circumstances. That is it is compulsory to segregate and treat the animals suffering (from scheduled diseases), however, the institute has neither segregated nor treated them despite the fact that several animals are suffering from bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, and Paratuberculosis, and the Institute claims it to be the Mecca Madina of Veterinary Sciences in India.

Section 32 suggests penalties for violating rules under the ACT. “Any person who contravenes the provisions of this Act or obstructs the Competent Officer in performing his duties shall be guilty of an offense punishable with a fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, and in case of failure to pay the penalty with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month; and in the case of any subsequent offense (whether under the same provision or any other provision of this Act except in case of sections 31 and 33) with a fine of two thousand rupees, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two months in case of non-payment of the penalty”.

Section 35 of the Act also makes the controlling officers liable for punishment for failing the Prevention of the escape of causative organisms.     In every institution, laboratory, or clinic, engaged in the manufacture, testing, or research, related to vaccines, sera, diagnostics, or chemotherapeutic drugs and aimed at the prevention or treatment of any scheduled disease, adequate precautionary measures shall be taken- a.     to ensure that the causative organism of any scheduled disease does not escape or otherwise get released; b.    to guard against any such escape or release, and c.     to warn and to protect everyone concerned in the event of any escape.

However, many Government livestock Farms are engaged in spreading diseases and sending sick, ailing, and old cows for slaughter.

     Also, it is very difficult to understand the intentions of Indian Politics and Politicians bluffing the ordinary people of India in the name of "Save the Holy Cow" or "गौरक्षा", "गौमाता" and "गौसेवा". Here is the data from two institutes under the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare which is sufficient to show the difference between saying and doing. RTI information revealed that thousands of cows and their progeny which are sick/ diseased, physically crippled/ unfit are sold to so-called farmers. 

           Dear friends, it is time to understand the political and Government motives behind all the dogma.  If the "Holy Cow" or "गौमाता" is really Holy, Pious, and Sacred and needs (certainly) to be saved, there is an urgent need to modify the "Prevention of cow slaughter Act and make it a Central Act rather than Act of States (creating confusion) and ensure its implementation on Government Livestock Farms too.

Diseased/ Disabled/ Aged/ Old/ Non-productive Cattle sold from Central Cattle Breeding Farms of Government of India

बीमार और दिव्यांग गौ-धन जो राष्ट्रीय डेरी अनुसंधान संस्थान ने किसानो को बेच दिया

Physically unfit and diseased cows and cow progeny sold from National Dairy Research Institute in the last 10 years to Farmers

बीमार और दिव्यांग गौ-धन जो भारतीय पशु-चिकित्सा अनुसंधान संस्थान ने किसानो को बेच दिया

Physically unfit and diseased cows and cow progeny sold from Indian Veterinary Research Institute in the last 10 years to Farmers

Source of Information RTI Act-2005

New Development

I wrote to PMO

Registration Number is : PMOPG/E/2019/0008820 

आदरणीय महोदय आपसे मेरा लोकहित में प्रश्न है कृपया उत्तर देने की कृपा करें, 

१. सरकारी फार्मों से अंधे-काने, लंगड़े-लूले, और बीमार बछड़े भी हाथों हाथ बिक जाते हैं और किसान की गाय के स्वस्थ बछड़े भी योगी बनने को मजबूर हैं, उनका कोई ग्राहक ढूंढे भी नहीं मिलता, मिलता भी है तो गौरक्षक उसे पीट-पीट कर मार डालते हैं, ऐसा क्यों?

२. सरकारी फार्म से बूढी, बीमार, अनुत्पादक, बेकार गाय-माता खरीदने के लिए होड़ मची होती हैं बोली लगाकर खरीदने वालों में, और किसान की उत्पादक गाय कौड़ियों के भाव भी खरीदने को, गौभक्तों और गौसेवकों के डर से, कोई राजी नहीं, आखिर क्यों?

३. किसान, गौपालक, अगर अपनी स्वस्थ गाय को बेचे तो पापी बन जाता हैं और अगर सरकार अपनी बूढी और बीमार गौमाता को बेचे तो गौरक्षक, गौसंवर्धक, गौसेवक सरकार, ऐसा क्यों?

4. क्या सरकारी फार्मों पर पलने वाली गौमाता संतति पवित्र हैं और उसके खरीदार, उसके बूढी, बीमार और बेकार होने पर भी, उसकी पूजा के लिए उसे खरीदते हैं और किसान की दुधारू गाय के खरीदार कसाई हैं जो उसे सिर्फ काटने के लिए खरीदते हैं? 

यहाँ गौसंवर्धक सरकारी संस्थानों से पिछले दस वर्षों में बेचीं गई, बीमार, बूढी, और अनुत्पादक गायों के जनसूचना अधिकार से प्राप्त आंकड़े दिए गए हैं, अवश्य विचार करें. azad-azadindia.blogspot.com-2018-10-mockery-of-prevention-of-cow-slaughter.html 

My questions to learned and enlightened Honourable Sir, are:

1. Why do purchasers readily purchase, through auction, crippled, diseased, and useless males (calves and aged/ spent bulls) cattle from Government Farms but farmers or cow raisers fail to sell even healthy male calves, left to be roaming and becoming Yogi? 

2. Purchasers line up to buy aged, spent, diseased, non-productive, useless Holy cows from Government cattle farms, and farmers fail to sell their healthy and productive cows, why?

3. If a farmer sells his or her healthy and productive cows he or she becomes a sinner however if Government sells its aged, diseased, and non-productive holy cow remains Cow-protector, Cow-propagator and Cow-server, why? 

4. Do Cattle from Government Cattle farms are Pious GauMata and people purchase the aged, diseased and uneconomic Holy Cows and their Progeny to worship, and cows at Farmers' homes are non-pious, they sell for slaughter only, or vice-versa?

Here is the data of diseased, disabled, unproductive, and aged cows sold in the last 10 years from different Government Cattle Farms, think and think to search for the answer. azadindia.blogspot.com-2018-10-mockery-of-prevention-of-cow-slaughter.html 

Complaint Filed with CVC

The RTI information has revealed that from two institutes under the ICAR, IVRI, and NDRI, thousands of cows and their progeny which were sick or diseased, physically crippled, or unfit were sold to so-called farmers in the last five years. Do all those were really sold to farmers, do can farmers make any use of those sick and disabled animals, they were certainly sold to butchers for slaughter which is a clear violation of the Prevention of Cow slaughter Acts of PU and Haryana, where the Institutes are situated. Further, the act of selling the sick or diseased cow or any other animal is also a violation of the PCICDA Act 2009. I request herewith a stern inquiry and action against those responsible. 

A complaint has been successfully registered. 

Complaint No:	123651/2019/vigilance-7
Complaint Against Name:	DG ICAR
Designation:	DG
Organization:	INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
Upload Scan Document:	No File Chosen

The Schedule Diseases permit the killing of animals including the Holy Cow as per PCICDA Act-2009. Still, they are applicable only to seven states of India (Punjab, Goa, Daman & Diu, Pondicherry, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand & Orissa) due to provisions under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Acts.

 Multiple species diseases 1. Anthrax. 2. Aujeszky's disease. 3. Bluetongue. 4. Brucellosis. 5. Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever. 6. Echinococcosis/hydatidosis. 7. Foot and mouth disease. 8. Heartwater. 9. Japanese encephalitis. 10. Leptospirosis. 11. New World screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax). 12. Old World screwworm (Chrysomya bezziana). 13. Paratuberculosis. 14. Q fever. 15. Rabies. 16. Rift Valley fever. 17. Rinderpest. 18. Trichinellosis. 19. Tularemia. 20. Vesicular stomatitis. 21. West Nile fever. 

Cattle diseases 1. Bovine anaplasmosis. 2. Bovine babesiosis. 3. Bovine genital campylobacteriosis. 4. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy. 5. Bovine tuberculosis. 6. Bovine viral diarrhea. 7. Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia. 8. Enzootic bovine leucosis. 9. Haemorrhagic septicemia. 10. Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/infectious pustular vulvovaginitis. 11. Lumpy skin disease. 15 12. Malignant catarrhal fever. 13. Theileriosis. 14. Trichomonosis. 15. Trypanosomosis

Proposal for Vaccine and Vaccination Policy for control of Animal Diseases in India/ भारत की पशु रोग नियंत्रण के लिए नई प्रस्तावित टीकाकरण नीति

Proposal for Vaccine and Vaccination Policy for Control of Animal Diseases in India

The problems of vaccines and vaccinations are complex in the livestock sector and cannot be solved without educating livestock owners, veterinarians, society and having the social and political will. For the success in controlling and eradicating vaccine-preventable diseases involvement of whole society is must, but the question, the really difficult one, is how to involve all stakeholders, how to build the confidence and hunger to succeed. In October 2018, MoS for Department of Dairying, Fisheries and Animal Husbandry under the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare called a meeting for the draft of more efficient vaccine and vaccination policy. In part, the new policy has been implemented experimentally in Haryana. However, only future may tell either the policy will be adopted or not, accepted by various state governments of not, practised by veterinarians and livestock owners or not and yield desirable results or not. The direct losses estimated based on spillover reports indicated that average annual economic losses due to HS, FMD, Brucellosis, PPR, classical swine fever were in tune of Rs. 5255 crores (2014), Rs. 20000 crores (2016), Rs. 20400 crores (2015), Rs. 2417 crores (2016), and Rs. 429 crores (2016), respectively. It indicated that farmers incur almost Rs. 50,000 crores direct loss every year due to the five fully preventable (with vaccination) diseases. The Government of India along with state government spend equally good amount of funds on vaccination and almost one lakh crore rupees are wasted every year due to our legacy to hide the disease, due to substandard vaccines, inefficient vaccination, ill-education of livestock farmers and above all the political will (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332865437_Foot_and_Mouth_Disease_Control_Program_FMD-CP_Corruption_Syndicate_of_India; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332103614_Indian_Disease_Disseminating_Research_Institute_IDDRI). The caucus of corruption operating at all levels starting from politicians, policymakers, sub-standard vaccine producers, quality control officers, purchasers, suppliers, vaccinators and livestock owners ends up with this huge loss in the era when we just have two and half year to fulfil the dream of doubling the farmers income.

To counter the problems the following is proposed

1.    Multivalent (bivalent, trivalent and polyvalent vaccine should be given preference over monovalent vaccines to cover more than one disease prevalent during control programmes to save money, time and other expenses and also to reduce the burden on implementing agencies (veterinarians and livestock workers).

2.     Vaccines should be purchased through global tender and producers must use seed strains of Indian origin only preferably supplied by the National Vaccine Seeds Centres (IVRI, PDFMD etc.).

3.    All the vaccine batches must be sampled as per rule by competent people like drug inspectors, and before dispatch, the samples must be coded at the level of the sampler. Coded samples should be dispatched to any of four centres (selected) for testing using scientific randomization.

4.    Vaccine quality testing must not be done by any of the vaccine seed supplier or technology provider (like the Indian Veterinary Research Institute or any other such institute involved in vaccine technology development).

5.    At the selected Centres (preferably 4 State Veterinary Universities from different regions having required facilities) following Characters of Vaccines need to be tested as per international standards, not only as per Indian Pharmacopeia, for each and every batch, needs no animals

·         Antigenic mass

·         Sterility for killed vaccine & freedom from any extraneous organism in a live vaccine

·         Innocuity (harmlessness)

·         Freedom from any non-inactivated virus or bacteria in an inactivated or live vaccine

·         Emulsion stability for oil-adjuvanted vaccine

·         Self-life

For randomly selected 5% batches (out of those passed in non-animal tests) testing in target animals (at CCS NIAH, Baghpat) for

·         Safety

·         Potency/ immunogenicity/ protection power

No Vaccine batch should be released for use without completion of the testing and it should be done within a specified period (21-30 d1ys).

6.       Implementing agencies: State animal husbandry/ veterinary services/ Animal health NGOs

7.       Sero-monitoring agencies should monitor seroconversion in the sample collected randomly (as per NIVEDI, Bengaluru protocol) by the implementing or any other independent agencies using DIVA tests. Sero-monitoring should be done at all State or Central Veterinary universities excluding those four involved in vaccine quality testing.

8.       Case/ outbreak reporting should be the responsibility of KVKs/ Farmers/ NGOs/ village panchayats etc. Reporting must be associated with a reward like promotion/ increment/ monitory support etc.

9.       Investigation of all the reported outbreak should be the responsibility of RDDL and CDDLs and all the positive cases/ virus isolates should be submitted to PDFMD (in case of FMD) and other National virus/ bacterial or pathogen seed centres for fingerprinting and monitoring antigenic variation or pathogen evolution so that Seeds used in vaccine production can be modified/ changed in time. In case of any kind of vaccine and vaccination failure investigation must be conducted at priority by the concerned RDDL/ CDDL.

10. In cases (outbreaks after vaccination) of the vaccine failure, the producer company must be made responsible to meet all the losses to farmers, expenses on vaccination, and on three consecutive failures of vaccines, the company must be debarred, blacklisted for all of its products. In the cases of Vaccine failures (outbreaks after vaccination) the head of the vaccine quality testing team for the specific batch or batches must be terminated and prosecuted and his team members must be demoted and punished.

11. In the case of vaccination failure (at the implementing agencies end/ farmers end) appropriate administrative action must be taken to ensure proper implementation of the vaccination programme(s).

12. Approval/ release of the vaccines to be used in Disease Control programmes and for animal use: All the vaccine seeds/ vaccines properly evaluated for their safety and efficacy in Indian conditions through first, second and third phase clinical trials yielding sufficient data be approved/ released for the animal use in India.

13. The chairmen and secretaries of the committees responsible for approval/ release of vaccines already in the market without any or insufficient data relating efficacy/ safety/ potency and clinical trials must be appropriately punished and put for criminal prosecution at the earliest. The members of such approving or releasing committees may also be punished appropriately.  

14. The agencies/ companies selling/ marketing unapproved vaccines and related medicines in India must be blacklisted and brought under criminal prosecution.

15. Up-gradation and strengthening of state Biologicals Production units through the provision of GMP facilities, training, new vaccine technologies and vaccine seeds free of cost at a subsidized cost to create healthy competition in the market for better quality products.
As an alternative, the vaccine producers and suppliers be given responsibility to deliver the vaccines to the end-users in required storage and use conditions, often saying the failure of cold chain at users end, and made responsible for losses to farmers in event of vaccine and vaccination failure through the accountability settlement process.

Hindi Version 

भारत की पशु रोग नियंत्रण के लिए नई प्रस्तावित टीकाकरण नीति

१. जहाँ उपलब्धता है एवं आवश्यकता है वहां एकाधिक रोगों की रोकथाम हेतु संयुक्त टीकों का प्रयोग किया जाए जिससे कि टीकाकरणमें होने वाला व्यय एवं समय बचाया जा सकेगा.

२. रोगों के टीकों की उपलब्धता वैश्विक टेंडर के जरिये निश्चित की जाए परन्तु सभी निर्माताओं को भारत में प्रभावी एवं प्रामाणिकवैक्सीन सीड    समान भाव पर राष्ट्रीय वैक्सीन सीड सेंटर (भा. पशु चिकित्सा अनुसंधान संस्थान एवं अन्य) से उपलब्ध कराया जाए.

३. सभी वैक्सीन के सभी बैच के योग्य अधिकारियों  द्वारा नमूने लिए जाएँ तथा उनकी कोडिंग करके ही विभिन्न जांच केंद्रों को भेजे जाएँ.

४. वैक्सीन की जांच की अनुमति किसी भी वैक्सीन सीड एवं टेक्नोलॉजी देने वाले संस्थान को ना दी जाए.

५. सभी वैक्सीन नमूनों के जांच तीन या चार चयनित (देश के विभिन्न भागों में स्थित पशु चिकित्सा विश्व विद्यालयों में) निम्न लिखितगुणों के लिए अंतर्राष्ट्रीय एवं भारतीय मानकों के अनुसार कराई जाए.

·         एंटीजेनिक द्रव्यमान

·         मृत जीवाणुओं/ विषाणुओं से निर्मित वैक्सीनों के लिए स्टेरिलिटी और जीवित जीवाणुओं/ विषाणुओं से निर्मित वैक्सीनों के लिए किसीअन्य जीवाणु / विषाणु  से मुक्ति लिए.

·         संभावित हानिकारक कारकों से मुक्ति हेतु.

·         मृत जीवाणुओं/ विषाणुओं से निर्मित वैक्सीनों में क्रियाशील या जीवित जीवाणुओं/ विषाणुओं की उपस्थिती से मुक्ति हेतु.

·         यदि वैक्सीन तेलीय एडजुवन्ट युक्त है तो उसकी इमल्सन शक्ति एवं स्थायित्व के लिए

·         वैक्सीन की स्थिरता (selflife) के लिए

जो वैक्सीन उपर्युक्त मानकों पर खरे हों उन्हें वैज्ञानिक तौर पर रैंडम विधि द्वारा ५-१०% चयन करके उपयुक्त पशुओं मेंराष्ट्रीय पशु स्वास्थय संस्थान बागपत में निम्नलिखित गुणों के लिए जांचा जाए.

·         सुरक्षित होना

·         प्रभावी होना

कोई भी वैक्सीन बैच बिना जाँच पूरी हुए प्रयोग के लिए ना रिलीज किया जाए. सभी जांच एक माह के अंदर ही पूर्ण की जाएँ.

६. राष्ट्रीय रोग नियंत्रण में टीका कारण की जिम्मेदारी राज्यों के पशुपालन एवं पशुचिकित्सा विभागों, एवं NGO के माध्यम से सुनिश्चितकी जाए.

७. सेरोमॉनीटरिंग का कार्य सिर्फ उन संस्थानों के माध्यम किया जाए जो किसी अन्य कार्य जैसे सीड या टेक्नोलॉजी प्रदान करने, वैक्सीनोंकि गुणवत्ता की जांच या टीकाकरण के कार्यों में ना लगे हों (जैसे कि पशुचिकित्सा महाविद्यालयों द्वारा) DIVA विधि द्वारा कराई जाए.इस कार्य के नमूने पशुचिकित्सकों द्वारा NIVEDI बेंगलुरु द्वारा निर्धारित वैज्ञानिक विधि द्वारा इकट्ठे किये जाएँ.

८.रोगों के होने की सुचना देने का कार्य कृषक, कृषक संस्थाएं, ग्राम पंचायतें, और कृषि विज्ञान केंद्रों को दिया जाए. रोगों की सूचना देनेवालों को यथायोग्य पुरस्कार का प्रावधान हो.

९. रोगों के प्रकोप की सभी सूचनाओं की जांच RDDL एवं CDDL एवं अन्य नैदानिक प्रयोगशालों से त्वरित गति से कराई जाए, और उनसेविलगित जीवाणुओं/ विषाणुओं को फिंगरप्रिंटिंग और संजोने के लिए रिफरेन्स केंद्रों एवं वैक्सीन सीड रखने वाले संस्थानों को दिया जाएजिससे की जीवाणुओं/ विषाणुओं में आने वाले परिवर्तनों का आंकलन करके यथासमय वैक्सीनों के सीड्स में परिवर्तन किया जा सके.

१०. यदि कहीं रोग का कारण वैक्सीन में कमी होना पाया जाये तो वैक्सीन निर्माताओं को सम्पूर्ण हानि (पशुओं में, टीकाकरण आदि में)भरपाई  के जिम्मेदार ठहराया जाए, तथा त्वरित एवं प्रभावी तरीके से भरपाई कराई जाए , तथा तीन बार ऐसा होने की स्थिति में सम्बंधितनिर्माता कंपनी को आने वाले समय में वैक्सीन निर्माण से प्रतिबंधित किया जाए. साथ ही इन मामलों में प्रयुक्त वैक्सीन को गुणवत्ता मेंपास करने वाली  संस्था/ टीम के अध्यक्ष को निलंबित और कार्य मुक्त करते हुए कानूनी कार्यवाही की जाये, इन मामलों में सम्बंधितजांच टीम के सदस्यों पर भी यथायोग्य दंडात्मक कार्यवाही की जाए.

११. यदि कहीं रोग का कारण टीकाकरण में कमी को पाया जाए तो टीकाकरण के लिए जिम्मेद्दार लोगों पर दंडात्मक कार्यवाही की जाएतथा कमियों को दूर करने के उपाय किये जाएँ.

१२. वैक्सीन या वैक्सीन सीड्स के रिलीज या प्रयोग के लिए प्रमाणित करने से पूर्व उनके प्रमाणीकरण के लिए आवश्यक दस्तावेज जैसेकि प्रथम, द्वितीय एवं तृतीय स्तर के क्लीनिकल ट्रायल के सफलता सम्बन्धी दस्तावेज, पूरी तरह योग्य समितिओं द्वारा जांचे जाएँ.सभी प्रमाणीकरण के लिए आवश्यक दस्तावेज जनसूचना हेतु संबधित वेबसाइट पर हरसमय उपलब्ध होने चाहियें.

१३. बाजार में यदि कोई वैक्सीन या औषधी बेचीं जा रही या प्रयुक्त हो रही है जिसके प्रमाणीकरण के लिए आवश्यक दस्तावेज नहीं हैं तोप्रमाणीकरण के लिए जिम्मेदार समिति के अध्यक्ष एवं सचिव पर कड़ी दंडात्मक कानूनी कार्यवाही की जाए.

१४. इस तरह के घटिया प्रामाणिक एवं अप्रमाणिक वैक्सीन और दवा उत्पादक एवं विक्रेता संस्थानों / कंपनियों पर दंडात्मक कानूनीकार्यवाही के साथ ही उन्हें तात्कालिक प्रभाव से इस व्यापार में निरुद्ध किया जाए.

15. राजकीय वैक्सीन उत्पादक इकाइयों का  वैक्सीन टेक्नोलॉजी, वैक्सीन सीड्स निशुल्क या रियायती दरों पर उपलब्ध कराकर, उन्नत तकनीकों में ट्रेनिंग देकर तथा GMP सुविधाएँ विकसित कराकर  उन्नतिकरण और सुदृढ़ीकरण. इससे स्वस्थ प्रतिस्पर्धा का विकास करने एवं अच्छी गुणवत्ता के वैक्सीन उपलब्धता में सहयोग मिलेगा. 
विकल्प के तौर पर वैक्सीन निर्माता एवं प्रदाता कंपनियों को ही किसान के पशुओं तक वैक्सीन पहुँचाने की जिम्मेदारी दी जाए जिससे हर बार वैक्सीन के फेल होने पर उनका यह कहना कि वैक्सीन को सही ढंग से रक्खा नहीं गया या लगाया नहीं गया, बंद हो सके, साथ ही वैक्सीन और टीकाकरण के फेल होने पर उनकी नियमानुसार जिम्मेदारी निश्चित की जा सके. 

हम विज्ञान के नाम पर किस तरह से अपने देश के साथ गद्दारी और धोखा करते हैं देख कर शर्म आती है

जागो किसान, जागो पशुपालक, जागो पशुचिकित्सक, देर होने से पहले, वरना ठगे से रह जाओगे और माँगते रहना भीख नेताओं से, सरकार से, संसार से

Wakeup farmers, wakeup Vets, be truthful to the Nation.

RTI information revealed that in NDRI Karnal Triovac vaccine for HS, FMD and BQ has been in use in the last 10 years. But we are not recommending it for use in Farmers, animals. moreover why IVRI is bluffing that there is no data on the multivalent vaccine. The similar vaccine is also used in all military dairy farms, LUVAS, CIRB & GLF Hissar. Why IVRI is conducting experiments on this vaccine? Why already available data on the use of FMD HS BQ vaccine can't be taken available in the same organization i.e., ICAR or why data can't be provided for analysis? There appears to be something fishy. It needs investigations; it is the mere waste of time and money.

This vaccine is in the market for decades but has never been tested for quality, safety and potency at IVRI, the only approved vaccine quality testing centre. What does this indicate? Vaccines and drugs of some big companies are never sampled and tested. It is the democracy of India. That is why we need to change the vaccine and vaccination policy.

https://azad-azadindia.blogspot.com/2018/10/proposal-for-vaccine-and-vaccination.html

If multivalent vaccines (Trivalent, FMD+HS+BQ or Bivalent FMD +HS) were not approved, then Punish the Producer and Seller of such vaccines for decades, forgetting how big the names are behind this heinous act to bluff the poor farmers and livestock owners of India.

If such multivalents were approved, without sufficient data (for which now IVRI is trying to generate data under a multimillion project), let those traitors be hanged for approving the vaccines without safety and efficacy data for those vaccines.

If you can't do anything be ready to be bluffed, live in hell, be cheated, be poor, and be beggars.