सुना है अगले वर्ष पैदा हो जाएंगे दो करोड़ और हिन्दुस्तानी
कोरोनाकाल में कितने
काल के गाल
में समा जाएंगे
ये तो पता
नहीं, पर,
देश के अमीरों
तुम्हे बचाने के लिए
इस वर्ष भी
ख़ाख़ हो जाएंगे
करोड़ों हिन्दुस्तानी,
यूँ तो सरकार
ने खैरात बांटी
है बहुत, फिर
भी भूख से
मर जाएंगे करोड़ों
हिन्दुस्तानी,
हमारी औकात ही
क्या है, कभी
रेल पथ पर
सोते हुए, कभी
राजपथ पर रोते
हुए
तो कभी किसी
अमीर की फैक्ट्री
के धुंए से
मर जाएंगे करोड़ों
हिन्दुस्तानी,
मेरे भारत, तेरी नदी
का पानी जहर
हो गया है,
जिसे पीके परलोक
चले जाएंगे करोड़ों
हिन्दुस्तानी,
मेरे भारत तेरी
ज़मीन में उगते
नहीं अब दरख्त
गरीबो को छाँव
देने के लिए,
धूप में
जल कर मर
जाएंगे करोड़ों हिन्दुस्तानी,
मेरे देश के
अमीर पीते हैं
खून गरीब का
या फिर किसी
विदेशी झरने का
पानी,
अक्सर होती हैं
उनकी ख्वाबगाहों में
रंगो-नूर की
महफ़िलें, उन रंगो
की धुलाई में
बह जाएंगे करोड़ों
हिन्दुस्तानी,
देश के नायकों
खुशियां मनाओ आ
रही है नई
खेप मजूरों की,
सुना है अगले
वर्ष पैदा हो
जाएंगे दो करोड़
और हिन्दुस्तानी।
आका हमारे कहते हैं,
ज़िंदा रहे तो
मिल जाएगा दाना
-पानी,
खाने को कुछ
नहीं है, पीने
को कुछ नहीं
है, कोई बात
नहीं, यह तो
वर्षों का है
सलीका हमारे जीने
का,
तकरीरें सुन कर
अच्छा लगता है,
पर फिर सोचता
हूँ,
भूख से बिलखकर
मर गए जो,
अब तक क्या
कभी ज़िंदा नहीं
थे वो?
ये देश भी
अजीब है मेरे
दोस्त जहाँ मरे
हुए भी मर
जाते हैं दुबारा
और बार बार,
जीने की आस
में,
घर में रहो
बंद वरना मर जाएंगे
करोड़ों हिन्दुस्तानी,
हम मर गए तो ठीक,
ज़िंदा रहे तो
मिल जाएगा दाना
-पानी।
सुना है इशू
अपनी सलीब को
ले कर गए
थे प्रभु के
पास और अमर
हो गए,
हम तो पुश्तों
से ढो रहे
हैं अपनी सलीबें,
पर अपना तो
खून अभी भी
साफ़ ना हुआ बन
कर रह गया
गटर का कीच
पैदा हुए
थे जैसे, वैसे
ही रह गए
बनके गंदे, मजूर,
मजबूर और नीच
के नीच करोड़ों हिन्दुस्तानी।
सुना है अगले
वर्ष पैदा हो
जाएंगे दो करोड़
और हिन्दुस्तानी।
From Wall of my Daughter
Today many countries have an interesting paradox. Do we continue lockdown for a very long time and wipe out our economies or let a few 100 million die and keep the economies going.
The Protogoras Paradox succinctly captures the paradox of our times!
Protagoras Paradox
Over 2000 years ago, in Greece, there was a lawyer named Protagoras. A young student, Euthalos, requested to apprentice under him, but was unable to pay the fees. The student struck a deal saying, “I will pay your fee the day I win my first case in the court”. Teacher agreed. When the training was complete and a few years had elapsed without the student paying up, the teacher decided to sue the student in the court of law.
The teacher thought to himself: ‘If I win the case, as per the law, the student will have to pay me, as the case is about non-payment of dues. And if lose the case, the student will still have to pay me, because he would have won his first case. Either way I will get paid’.
The student’s view was, ‘If I win the case, I won’t have to pay the teacher, as the case is about my non-payment of fees. And if I lose the case, I don’t have to pay him since I wouldn’t have won my first case yet. Either way I will not pay the teacher.’
This is known as Protagoras Paradox, which ever way you look both have equally convincing arguments, one can go either way in supporting the teacher or the student and would not be wrong.
Those in medical practice often come across such situations, either in making a diagnostic or therapeutic decision. One physician can recommend a course of treatment based on scientific evidence and another can recommend a diametrically opposite course again based on medical evidence. Right or wrong, but some merit would exist on both sides. Often the physician himself is having an internal struggle to make a decision about the most appropriate course of action, Protagoras & Euthalos are arguing in his mind, to do this or to do that. The horns of dilemma are tearing him apart.
But what prompted this essay was a tweet by Donald Trump, ‘hope the cure is not worse than the disease’. I hate to say, but I find some merit in this tweet. In our global attempt to flatten the COVID curve, one hopes that we do not flatten the global economy curve. The question is what’s the best way forward. One group recommends ‘total lockdown’ to break the transmission chain, based on evidence from China, they managed to control the spread of the virus by ruthless lock down and 3 months later they are showing that disease is controlled in Wuhan. On the other hand, the other school of thought is graded isolation & protection of elderly and very young and those with co-morbidities, let it spread amongst the young and healthy, after all the disease ultimately will be controlled when we achieve ‘herd immunity’. The medical community is divided in these two groups. To enforce complete lockdown or Graded isolation?
To complicate the issue the epidemiologists have joined the bandwagon with cacophony of statistical analysis. From Rosy to Dooms day predictions. If we don’t do a complete lockdown then a million people will die in 1 year. No say some more like 90 million will die in 1 year. Whose data analysis is correct. Some suggest do nothing, nature will take over in a few months and all will be well, they quote historical data to justify their recommendations. On whose inputs should we base our disaster management strategy.
Then come the economists with their doomsday predictions. If this continues till May our medical resources will be overwhelmed, Agriculture will suffer, food shortages will occur, production will come to a standstill. There will be an economic crisis of the proportions that world has not seen ever. So, break this lockdown nonsense and let’s get back to work as usual.
What will our political masters do. My guess is they will listen to medical experts, epidemiologists & economists. Then they will decide what course of action will ensure their survival, what will get them people’s votes and they will run with that. At present ‘Lockdown” finds favour with them. Boris in UK had to abandon the recommendations of the medical community about graded response, because the people’s perception became that our Government is not doing enough to protect us citizens. That means revolt against him. So,screw it, lets go with total lockdown if that’s what the people want. Gradually people will get tired of lockdown and demand- let life go on. Then with equally convincing arguments the governments will say the time has now come to lift the blockade, we have controlled the contagion, we have won. Unfortunately, the costs in either case will be huge, both lives and money!
Incidentally the Protagoras Paradox has not been resolved till date. Students in Law school still hold mock trial and give arguments on both sides wthout any resolution of the dispute.
Really a perplexing situation.
