Science in India: Progress towards becoming Vishwa-Guru & the Indian Council of Agricultural Research
India
spends 0.65% of its GDP (~2.6 trillion) on research and development (R&D) continuously
after 2014. However, it was 0.81% of GDP in 2005-06. State and Central
Government share has shrunk from 35% (in 2010) to 24% (in 2018) and steadily
going down. Of the total R&D expenditure, ~37% goes to the health and defense
sector and only 2% towards education
(https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/Research%20and%20Deveopment%20Statistics%202019-20_0.pdf).
India in comparison to other major economies: As per statistics of 2018 (Tab. 1), USA (2.83% of >20 trillion GDP), China (2.14% of >13 trillion GDP), Japan (3.28% of ~5 trillion GDP), Germany (3.13% of >4 trillion GDP), UK (1.7% of >2.8 trillion GDP), France (2.19% of ~2.8 trillion GDP), Italy (1.39% of >2 trillion GDP), South Korea (4.53 of >1.6 trillion GDP), Canada (1.54% of >1.6 trillion GDP), Russia (0.98% of >1.5 trillion GDP) and Australia (1.8% of >1.3 trillion GDP), Israel (4.94% of >0.4 trillion GDP). Though India is the 6th biggest economy in the world it is at 13th place in total expenditure on R&D. If we consider per-capita expenditure on R&D, India stands at 19th place with an expenditure of about Rs. 900 per person per year much behind Switzerland spending Rs. 2.16 lakhs per person on R&D in the country.
According
to scientific manpower and infrastructure ICAR is one of the biggest organizations
funded publicly. National Agricultural Research System (NARS)
under DARE/ICAR consists of 103 Agricultural Research Institutes, 75 Agricultural Universities, 82 All India Coordinated Research
Projects/Network Projects, and 11 Agriculture Technology Application Research
Institutes ably supported by a network of 721 Krishi Vigyan Kendras. For about Rs. 14065
crores allocated to Agriculture R&D, ICAR received about 7846 crores in
2020 and about 500 crores went to other DARE activities. There are about 5000
scientists out of a total of 17000 employees in the ICAR system.
From Table 2 it is evident that by spending one rupee on purchasing consumables for research ICAR spends about 10 rupees on administration. My experience says that this expense on administration is largely to safeguard the one rupee from misuse spent on the purchase of the consumables. A great organization with great management by great managers. From the facts, it may be inferred that either scientists in the organization are wasteful or dishonest, and saving that one rupee (the Golden coin) spent by scientists on the purchase of consumables is more valuable than anything else in the organization.
Though I am not an expert on administration, it is interesting to note that administrative expenses in ICAR are almost 1.5 times more than operational expenses on research. There are 5000 scientists in ICAR, per scientist expenses on consumables are well below 1.5 lakh per annum while a scientist gets more salary per month than the money available to him for doing research per annum.
Is
there not a need to minimize the administrative charges to increase real
expense in research in form of the ability of a scientist to purchase more
chemicals and other consumables to do better research?
Is there
a need to reduce the number of scientists to reduce expenses on salary in ICAR? The
ICAR is an amazing system where scientists are recruited in the same manner of
recruitment of soldiers. At the time of recruitment, neither the recruiter nor
scientists know what works, for what project, and with what objectives the
recruitment and recruits need to justify. In lack of clarity, a lot of scientific
manpower goes to waste for years together, I have my example, after my recruitment
as principal scientist I was not given a workplace for years unless
I asked the Director-General of the ICAR (What for I have been paid the hefty
salary per month?).
One very interesting phenomenon or
fact with ICAR is that it prepared a hefty draft to double farmers’ income in
just three years without increasing its own agriculture income from lakhs of
hectares of land with NAARS even by 10% per year despite having 5000 scientists
and 17000 employees.
I understand the situation
may not be much different in other research organizations in India. I
understand that there is a need for large-scale restructuring of the research system
in India but it is not possible with political will.
This
situation needs a change regarding funding and research management if we have to give the pace to Indian Research in the Public
Sector.
Besides research funding, one more move of the Indian Govt is pertinent to be mentioned. There will now be fewer awards to Scientists of India for doing Research, wiping off about 100 award categories for research.